Jump to content
Afrii Diaspora Dialogue
  • Judge Hlophe granted leave to appeal JSC gross misconduct finding

    Judge Hlophe granted leave to appeal JSC gross misconduct finding

    In a minor victory for Western Cape Judge President John Hlophe, the High Court in Gauteng has granted him leave to appeal a gross misconduct finding by the Judicial Service Commission (JSC).

    He can now approach the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA).

    In August, the JSC ruled that Hlophe must face impeachment, a move which paves the way for his removal from the bench. The decision upholds a gross misconduct finding against Hlophe earlier this year by the Judicial Conduct Tribunal in relation to a complaint laid by Constitutional Court justices.

    Here’s a recap: Justices Bess Nkabinde and Chris Jafta, had accused Hlophe of trying to persuade them into ruling in favour of former president Jacob Zuma in 2008. This was in relation to Zuma’s arms deal case with French weapons manufacturer Thales, which is still before the courts.

    Hlophe is said to have visited them separately in their chambers to discuss pending judgments in the corruption matter, which is in breach of Section 165 of the Constitution. When the Tribunal ruled against Hlophe in April, it said his conduct seriously threatened and interfered with the independence, impartiality, dignity and effectiveness of the Constitutional Court and public confidence in the judicial system.

    WHAT JUDGE JOHN HLOPHE ARGUED IN HIS COURT BID

    In his application for leave to appeal, Judge John Hlophe accused the Johannesburg High Court of  misconstruing the Constitution and case law to find that the JSC was properly constituted when it concluded he should be impeached.

    He said the court should have instead taken the JSC to task for making errors in their probe against him for gross misconduct.

    “The motive for the court in embarking on a new approach to interpreting section 178 to avoid what it calls a paralysis … [gives] rise to a credible inference of a court intent on protecting unlawful proceedings for a purpose unrelated to the Constitution itself,” Judge Hlophe said.

    Freedom Under Law (FUL) recently reiterated its call for Judge Hlophe to be axed, following President Cyril Ramaphosa’s decision to suspend Public Protector Advocate Busisiwe Mkhwebane.

    “Freedom Under Law has repeatedly called on the JSC to recommend his suspension to the president: perhaps the action now taken against the public protector will galvanise them into action,” the organisation said.

    View the full article


    Khamisi
     Share

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    There are no comments to display.



    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

About

Afrii Diaspora Dialogue

A Platform for Dialogue for the African diaspora

A cultural and community website with a GO.A.L. to UpLift™ and EmPower™ the many different peoples, cultures, and communities of the Black and African diasporas.

Main links

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Guidelines, Privacy Policy, Terms of Use